🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are watching intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that smartphones and networks are "stealing our children's childhood". Legislation is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an similar ban could be "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to pass a proposal increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged families to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory motion calling for a ban for minors without parental consent is given. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" design of these services, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a good first step," commented the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any action must be "supported by robust data".

Earlier, interest grew behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to harmful platform posts argues that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to create tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," said a prominent peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, legislation is largely occurring at the local level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a measure banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule capping teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced measures demanding guardian approval for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from certain individuals to follow Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Apart from these regions, additional states are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global bodies take a more nuanced position. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The body points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

As this international discussion evolves, the actions of the Australian government and others demonstrate that governments internationally are increasingly content to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.